| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ferre
Cannabis Sacrament Minister.
Joined: 14 Apr 2003
Posts: 7295
Location: Amsterdam
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:00 pm Post subject: 'War on Terror' Out, 'Struggle Against Extremism' In |
 |
|
| Quote: |
What's in a Name? "War on Terror" Out, "Struggle Against Extremism" In
by Kim R. Holmes, Ph.D.
WebMemo #805
Recently, top officials of the Bush Administration have changed the way that they are talking about terrorism. They have stopped talking about a war on terrorism. Thinking it too narrowly defined, Administration officials now speak of a struggle against global extremism. Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld describes Americas policies as a global struggle against the enemies of freedom, the enemies of civilization.
Although all this may seem to be merely playing with words, this change is in reality something much more important: It is a clear-headed change of definition of Americas long-range strategic aims. It may not alter U.S. tactics or goals in the short run but could, over time, have a profound effect on the way Americans think about the current conflict against radical Islamic terrorist groups.
The Administration made the change for a number of reasons. The war on terror incorrectly focused too much attention on the military side of the campaign. Other effortssuch as homeland security, law enforcement, and international diplomacywere not captured by a phrase that conjures an image of soldiers in uniform combating other soldiers in uniformsomething that the current struggle decidedly is not.
The term war on terror overlooked the ideological component of the struggle. Radical groups employing terrorism against governments and civilians have an agenda, and that is to destroy certain governments, challenge certain Western values of civilization, and erect in their place their own governments and notions of culture and religion.
Finally, the change in terminology overcomes a problem long recognized in the phrase war on terrorism. Terrorism is a tactic employed by people to achieve certain political purposes. The new, broader approach captures not only the enemys political intent, but also suggests more precisely that our efforts will be a long-term struggle that may not have a termination date. Unlike with a war, there will be no simple peace treaty.
Of the two new terms used by the Bush Administration, Rumsfelds struggle against the enemies of freedom and civilization is the better. For one thing, it avoids making the mistake of replacing one inadequate term for the enemy with another equally inadequate termnamely, replacing terrorism with extremism. If extremism alone were the problemas opposed to the fact that certain extremists are using terror as a weaponthen we would be making war against non-violent groups outside the political and religious mainstream. But were not, and for good reason: Non-violent groups are not threatening anybody. The problem is the use of terror, not whether their views are extreme or not. We are fighting al Qaeda and its allies precisely because they are bombing people. We should be challenging not only their terrorist tactics, but also their ideology that leads them to kill in the name of religion.
For another, Rumsfelds description better captures the real principle at stake: These enemies of freedom and civilization are using violence against innocent peoplesomething so despicable that we call it terrorismnot just to take away their lives, but also to deprive them of their freedom. If Osama bin Laden and his friends ever manage to create the medieval Caliphate of their dreams, not only will the people who live under its boot suffer a loss of freedom, but so will the rest of us, as bin Laden goes about wiping out infidels in New York, Paris, and London.
The Administration still appears to be squeamish about naming radical Islam by name. While it is true that America opposes any ideological group that employs terrorism, it also is true that we are, correctly, fixated on radical Islamic groups. We have hesitated emphasizing this fact in some of our official public statements for fear of offending innocent Muslims or alienating potential allies in Muslim countries.
Might something be wrong still with our stated policy if we cannot articulate an obvious fact about our strategic aims? Its one thing to be tactically clever and not alienate innocent people or potential allies. But it is another if that reluctance blurs the reality of our objectives and confuses peopleparticularly Americansabout who our enemy really is and what really is at stake.
Tony Blair spoke clearly last week when he said, The best defense of the Muslim community in this country is for that leadership to be exercised and for the mainstream Muslim community to take on the extremists within their midst, within our midst. He recognizes that this struggle against radical Islamic terrorists will never be won unless Muslims themselves become as outraged as non-Muslims when terrorists defame Islam far more than any Gitmo soldier or any U.S. officials slip of the tongue could ever do.
Sometimes it is a good thing to speak plainly. The Bush Administration has rightly made a course correction in one of its most important slogans. The next step should be to think more seriously, as Tony Blair has done, about how to articulate the struggle in such a way that freedom-loving Muslims all over the world will want to unite to rid the scourge of violent extremism from their midst.
Kim R. Holmes, Ph.D., is Vice President of The Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies at The Heritage Foundation.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm805.cfm
|
_________________
█ Please read the Board Rules and Posting, and you
█ Radio Free Amsterdam
People who know truth, speak truth.
Those who don't, quote scriptures. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mystic Power
admin THC-Ministry YahooGroup
Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 3605
Location: Key West
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bush should have someone ghost write a book for him. He could call it, "MY STRUGGLE"...
...of course the German edition would be, "MEIN KAMPF" ...
Oh.
_________________
"We are the Ones we have been waiting for."
~Hopi Elder ~
"In Lak'ech"
~ Ancient Mayan: "I am another YOU." ~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Public Forum
Members only forum
Members Group
| 
