USA plans no sanctions but only nuclear strike against Iran

**Ferre**

USA plans no sanctions but only nuclear strike against Iran
_________________
█ Please read the Board Rules and Posting, and you
█ Radio Free Amsterdam
People who know truth, speak truth.
Those who don't, quote scriptures.

Johnny J · Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 3:18 am Post subject:

Anyone reading the Seymour Hersh article can see how serious and grave this situation is. Bush is DEAD serious about using a nuclear bomb on Iran, under the PRETEXT of 'busting' a 'bunker.' We must seriously consider the implications of this.

According Hersh, Bush feels he is the only one who has the "courage" to do this. For him courage is very much an abstraction, a very different thing for most everyone else.

Virtually all of the Democrats are supporting a strike on Iran. They are just as much pawns of the AIPAC lobby.

Just as the U.S. dropped a couple of atomic bombs on Japan to send a message to the Soviet Union, so Bush is doing this to send a message as well. And to whom?

!!johNnY j!!

**Mystic Power** · Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 7:12 am Post subject:

Don Quixote · Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 7:51 am Post subject:

brother Mystic Power is 100% right on this one.

just check out this link --->

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news.php?newsno=1970

if Venezuela and Iran decide to switch to Euro's its effect on the US. economy is going to be slightly larger than the effect the tsunami had on Ache.

the Dollar is already losing ground amid frantic attempts to bolster it.the financial institutions of the world are already p***ing in there pants at the mere suggestion of such a thing.

who will suffer as a result of all this ?will it be the rich ?or perhaps the poor ?bit of a 'no brainer' that one.!

Chavez professes a 'great solidarity" with the ordinary man , with his discounted heating oil scheme , and then he talks about a move which will do massive damage to the dollar and the US. economy.and of course it is the recipients of his past generosity who will get screwed.not the rich.

the word 'hypocracy' springs readily to mind !

PEACE

.

**aeroplane** · Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 11:21 am Post subject:

It is time for a paradigm shift, and anytime that happens waves are created. Dependency on the petro-$ (and petro) needs to give way to the winds of change if we want this planet to survive. No country has a right to hegemony. (What if Iran or Venezulia wanted to exchange oil for toilet paper? Don't they have that right?)

Those that resist change for fear of the karmatic impact upon their economies are only setting themselves up for greater economic/political/moral devastation. Forcing oil producing countries to stay the course with the petro-$ is nothing less than enforcing slavery.

The only thing I do not understand is why €-dependent nations like Germany & France would back the Anglo-American invasion of Iran to enforce the petro-$.

_________________
"Penalties against the possession of a drug
should not be more damaging to the individual
than the drug itself."

US President Jimmy Carter

IntrepidEZJ · Cannabis Sacrament Minister Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 381

This goes back to the effective dumbing down of our populace over the years.

For effect, it is again a good time to mention the difference between a true capitalist "free market economy" and our current "regulated", "mixed economy".

Regulation, is indeed, a very dirty word.

Let the market correct itself.

Those drunk with greed, are simply filled with fear and hypocrisy.

Don Quixote · Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 5:20 am Post subject:

"The only thing I do not understand is why €-dependent nations like Germany & France would back the Anglo-American invasion of Iran to enforce the petro-$."

the answere to that brother Aeroplane , is the good old BP pipe-line.

many years before we started attacking yugoslavia (the only nation in s.Europe with oil except Rumania.) , Afghanistan , Iraq , Azherbyan , Chechenia , and soon Iran i read a report in the Economist magazine.

it was all about BP's dream of a series of pipelines linking all the oil fields of Europe , the middle East and Asia together.the pipeline would start in southern Russia (the largest , untapped oil and gas reserves on earth) and would run right into Europe.

A second spur would run into the gulf of Hormuz to pump oil into tankers for trans-shipping to the USA.

A third spur would run into china and supply oil to China , Japan , and India and S.E.Asia.

the article speculated that Britain did not have the power to achieve this dream and would probably need the backing of a super-power , such as the USA , in order yo re-align (subjugate) the nations along the pipleline route.

think about it from a business point of view.they will completely control all of the distribution and most of the supply of oil and gas on earth.

the entire world is powered by oil. --- fact.

he who controls the worlds oil has absolute power --- fact

now ask youself this ?

who controls the worlds water and food supply. !?!

who owns the patents on the wheat , rice , potatoes and most of the food we eat.?

what is the name of the company that owns your tap water ?

now you know who the enemy is.

PEACE

.

IntrepidEZJ · Cannabis Sacrament Minister Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 381

What "plant" that comes from the Earth, can help combat this Oil problem.

Onward we march.