| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The GCW Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 19 Nov 2003 Posts: 430
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:53 am Post subject: The Supreme Court show. |
|
|
Everyone should know the Supreme Court just took arguments over the Angel Raich v. Ashcroft case.
This is some of the Editorials that have come out since in favor of cannabis use.
From the many editorials I read today on the Supremes gig, Editorial boards are speaking out against cannabis being denied to sick people; like I've never seen before.
420EDITORIALS
The federal government has never acknowledged what so many doctors and medical researchers years ago concluded -- that marijuana has healing and pain-relieving qualities. Las Vegas Sun http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1719/a09.html?397
It is difficult to imagine why the federal government is so adamant about denying sick and dying Americans some relief from their suffering. Ledger-Enquirer (GA) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1719/a03.html?397
Law is not an end unto itself. Law exists to facilitate and ensure justice. In that vein, we hope the Supreme Court leaves the use of medical marijuana a states' rights issue. Hickory Daily Record (NC) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1718/a07.html?397
The people of California and nine other states have decided that they want their citizens to be able to use marijuana when a doctor prescribes it as medically necessary. The federal government disagrees.
So now the question is before the Supreme Court: Who gets to decide? Do the people of these states have the right to make their own laws? Or should these laws be dictated to them by Washington?
The court should side with the states. Spartanburg Herald Journal (SC) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1718/a06.html?397
We have argued in the past that Congress should amend the federal Control Substances Act to reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to a Schedule II drug, an action that would allow for the medical use of marijuana. Republican, The (Springfield, MA) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1717/a09.html?397
It is always amusing ( if seldom enlightening ) to observe lawyers pontificating on medical topics. The medical marijuana case, Ashcroft v. Raich, heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, however, will turn not on whether lawyers and justices know much about medicine -- hint: they don't -- Valley Morning Star (TX) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1717/a07.html?397
Should Americans suffering from AIDS or cancer be allowed to smoke marijuana to ease their pain?
The voters of California think they should -- as long as the patient's doctor agrees.
Absolutist drug warriors in the White House and Congress, however, believe strict federal rules outlawing all marijuana use supersede state and local authority. Even brain cancer patients like Angel Raich of Oakland, Calif., must not be allowed to use medical marijuana. Tribune Review (Pittsburgh, PA) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1717/a04.html?397
Pop quiz: Which of the following drugs have federally approved medical uses, yet are highly addictive and can be lethal in an overdose?
A. Morphine
B. Cocaine
C. Marijuana.
Answer: A and B.
A zero-tolerance Congress declared war on Woodstock Nation in 1970 by classifying marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug, devoid of medical value and illegal in all uses. Thirty-four years later, despite the passage of laws in Oregon and 10 other states allowing doctors to prescribe marijuana for certain conditions, federal Drug Enforcement Administration agents are still sledgehammering law-abiding cancer patients' front doors in order to confiscate their pot. Register-Guard, The (OR) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1716/a08.html?397
THE FEDERAL government's crusade against users of "medical marijuana," even in states that allow sick people to have the drug, is obnoxious. Washington Post (DC) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1714/a07.html?53002
But it's interesting that in these politically divisive times, people still can come together when it comes to putting painkilling over politics. Helena Independent Record (MT) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1707/a06.html?53083
Of the various fronts in the nation's "war on drugs," none seems more perverse and pointless than the raids that Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft pressed Drug Enforcement Administration agents to stage against patients treating themselves with medical marijuana under Proposition 215, a law that California voters passed eight years ago. Los Angeles Times http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1706/a05.html?53083
SURELY THE federal government has better things to do than harass desperately ill people seeking relief under their states' medical marijuana laws. Boston Globe http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1703/a08.html?53083 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fyrefly1 Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 07 Sep 2004 Posts: 2209
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks GCW... _________________ Fyrefly1
"All truth passes through three stages: first it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer, 19th Century Philosopher |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lilli Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 12 Dec 2003 Posts: 4218
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wonderful post bro Thanks so much. _________________
I pass to you the torch that Christ once passed to me.
Others are still in the dark and need
the light to see.
"I AM"
"Gathering the fragments so that
none are lost"
His Shepherdess
http://missouri.thcministry.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The GCW Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 19 Nov 2003 Posts: 430
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A LTE at MAP...
US TN: PUB LTE: He Was A Longhair, After All
Pubdate: Wed, 15 Dec 2004
Source: Nashville Scene (TN)
Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04.n1721.a01.html
HE WAS A LONGHAIR, AFTER ALL
When it comes to medical cannabis ( "Let 'Em Smoke," Dec. 2 ), there is no need to ask, "What would Jesus do?" We already know.
Cannabis was not only known, it was widely used in biblical times. Jesus would have been familiar with cannabis; it was used at the time in healing unctions and temple incense and was fed to both man and livestock. In fact, it is not outside the realm of possibility that the Blessed Virgin Mary used it to ease the pains of childbirth. There is a wealth of documentation attesting to the safety and efficacy of this natural, healing herb stretching back over 5,000 years. It's mentioned repeatedly in the Bible. Yet, nowhere does Jesus caution against its use. Alcohol yes, cannabis no.
This Christmas, as we recall the visit of the Three Magi on that Holy Night, we might also remember that aromatic cannabis was a common ingredient in incense, along with frankincense and myrrh. It was good enough to give as a gift to the infant Jesus, it's good enough for me.
Rev. Steven B. Thompson
Benzonia, Mich.
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1797/a04.html?397
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Das High and aware

Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 13 Location: Hopefully The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 3:30 am Post subject: So? |
|
|
| I just skimmed through this, so what is going on? Is this still before the courts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lilli Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 12 Dec 2003 Posts: 4218
|
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. They have till June to decide. _________________
I pass to you the torch that Christ once passed to me.
Others are still in the dark and need
the light to see.
"I AM"
"Gathering the fragments so that
none are lost"
His Shepherdess
http://missouri.thcministry.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|