My Growing Penis

[Torkel]

I thought it would be alright to share this experience with my bros/sis's here:

When I first noticed that my penis was growing longer, I was delighted.

But several weeks and several inches later, I became concerned and went to see a urologist.

While my wife waited outside, the physician examined me and explained that, though rare my condition could be corrected by minor surgery.

My wife anxiously rushed up to the doctor after the examination and was told of the diagnosis and the need for surgery.

"How long will he be on crutches?" she asked.

"Crutches???" the doctor asked.

"Well, yes," my wife said "You are going to lengthen his legs, aren't you?"




Peace,
Torkel
_________________
Miller vs U.S. (230 F 2nd 486,489): "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime."

Miranda vs Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 125): "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them."

HAGANS vs LAVINE (415 US 533 N-3,note 5): "Once JURISDICTION is challenged it must be proven by the Plaintiff."

[Torkel]

I thought it would be alright to share this experience with my bros/sis's here:

When I first noticed that my penis was growing longer, I was delighted.

But several weeks and several inches later, I became concerned and went to see a urologist.

While my wife waited outside, the physician examined me and explained that, though rare my condition could be corrected by minor surgery.

My wife anxiously rushed up to the doctor after the examination and was told of the diagnosis and the need for surgery.

"How long will he be on crutches?" she asked.

"Crutches???" the doctor asked.

"Well, yes," my wife said "You are going to lengthen his legs, aren't you?"




Peace,
Torkel
_________________
Miller vs U.S. (230 F 2nd 486,489): "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime."

Miranda vs Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 125): "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them."

HAGANS vs LAVINE (415 US 533 N-3,note 5): "Once JURISDICTION is challenged it must be proven by the Plaintiff."