THC - Cannabis - Ministry :: Community Forum Index
Missing Facts in the Magbie Case

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    THC - Cannabis - Ministry :: Community Forum Index -> Cannabis news
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Lilli
Cannabis Sacrament Minister
Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 4218

PostPosted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:56 am    Post subject: Missing Facts in the Magbie Case Reply with quote

Quote:
Missing Facts in the Magbie Case
Posted by CN Staff on October 22, 2004 at 20:59:02 PT
By Colbert I. King
Source: Washington Post

Respect seems hard to come by for Jonathan Magbie, the 27-year-old quadriplegic who was dispatched to the D.C. jail by a Superior Court judge for 10 days for simple possession of marijuana. Magbie died five days after being placed in the custody of the D.C. Department of Corrections. Yesterday The Post published a letter from Rufus King III (absolutely no relation), chief judge of the Superior Court, who responded to a Post news story, an editorial and two of my columns ["Another Unnecessary Death in D.C.," Oct. 9, and "A Son's Death, A Mother's Unanswered Questions," Oct. 16] concerning Magbie's tragic death. Judge King said he felt it necessary to provide information about the late Jonathan Magbie that had not been included in some of The Post's coverage.

The judge recounted that at the time of his arrest, Magbie had cocaine in his pocket and had a gun in his possession, and that there was marijuana in the car. The judge also detailed the charges handed up against Magbie by a grand jury: carrying a pistol without a license, possession of an unregistered firearm, possession of ammunition, possession of a prohibited weapon (a machine gun), possession of cocaine and possession of marijuana.
Would that Judge King had shared all of the facts at his disposal.

Had he done so, the public also would have learned that the prosecution dropped all of the gun and cocaine charges against Magbie and, instead, offered him a guilty plea for marijuana possession, which Magbie accepted because it was consistent with his guilt (he had bought the marijuana and had someone place it under his seat in the car). Magbie assumed responsibility for his conduct.

Judge King might have also noted that Judge Judith Retchin, who sent Magbie to jail, knew that he could not have put a gun in the car because of his disability. Judge Retchin acknowledged as much when she sentenced Bernard Beckett, Magbie's co-defendant and driver of the car, on Sept. 20. Beckett pleaded guilty to carrying a pistol without a license and possessing an unregistered firearm. Retchin said to Beckett: "I know from the facts in this case that you and your co-defendant [Magbie], who is a paraplegic and unable to move and control items, were driving around in a car with a loaded gun. [Judge Retchin misstated his condition. Magbie was barely five feet tall, a quadriplegic, paralyzed from the neck down, and needed a motorized, chin-operated wheelchair to move around.] And I understand that at the time of his arrest and your arrest, [Magbie] told you to put the gun on him. Someone had to put the gun on him because he couldn't manipulate the gun."

So the gun charges, Judge King might well have told you, ended up with Beckett. Judge Retchin sentenced Beckett to one year in jail for carrying a pistol without a license with all but 10 days suspended, and a one-year suspended sentence on the charge of possessing an unregistered firearm.

As for the cocaine charge, Judge Retchin noted during Magbie's sentencing that neither he nor Beckett "has pleaded guilty to the cocaine, but I understand cocaine was found in your coat." Again, unmentioned in Judge King's letter was the fact that Magbie was not convicted of any cocaine charge.

But maybe it was enough for the chief judge to repeat unproven charges against Magbie without explaining their ultimate disposition.

Oh, how I wish that the court's attention to public records was as meticulous. I sought, for example, to learn how many other similarly situated first-time offenders have been given jail sentences in D.C. Superior Court for possession of marijuana. Court spokeswoman Leah Gurowitz wrote in an e-mail on Tuesday: "The court does not compile any aggregate disposition of sentencing data."

Too bad; it would be nice to know. In sentencing Magbie, Judge Retchin referred to a pre-sentencing report claiming Magbie had said that using marijuana made him feel better. The report, the judge said, also stated that Magbie probably would not stop using marijuana because he didn't believe there was anything wrong with it. "As long as it's against the law," she told him, "you're not permitted to do it, Mr. Magbie."

I don't know whether it's true that marijuana helps control the spasticity and chronic pain associated with quadriplegia, as Ryan Grim of the Marijuana Policy Project asserted in an e-mail this week. Neither can I accept or challenge Grim's claim that marijuana, while not a curative treatment, was an ameliorative one that helped relieve Magbie's symptoms. It is, however, clear that Judge Retchin considered more than the marijuana charge in sentencing Magbie.

She told Magbie that she had decided against giving him straight probation because while he did not plead guilty to having the gun -- as did his co-defendant Beckett -- she considered it "just unacceptable to be riding around in a car with a loaded gun in this city. . . . I believe under all the circumstances here, the appropriate sentence is ten days in jail," Judge Retchin declared.

So the gun charges to which Beckett pleaded guilty -- the gun charges that the prosecution was unable or unwilling to prove against Magbie and that Magbie never accepted as part of his guilt -- were used by Judge Retchin against Magbie. The law allows that, Chief Judge King said in his letter. That reasoning was enough to put him in jail, where his life ended.

There's so much in this case to regret.

More than a year before Magbie appeared before Judge Retchin for sentencing, he had started to turn his life around, according to Shuaib B. Neel of the Concerned Muslims of Annapolis. Neel told me in a phone interview on Thursday that Magbie had been attending classes faithfully since April 2003, except when prevented by illness. As a young believer, Neel said, Magbie was an inspiration to all.

Judge and jailers? Well, perhaps not all.

Source: Washington Post (DC)
Author: Colbert I. King
Published: Saturday, October 23, 2004; Page A23
Copyright: 2004 Washington Post
Contact: letterstoed@washpost.com
Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com

Related Articles:

A Son's Death, a Mother's Unanswered Questions
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19651.shtml

Another Unnecessary Death in D.C.
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19617.shtml

Disabled Man Dies In D.C. Jail
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19604.shtml

_________________

I pass to you the torch that Christ once passed to me.
Others are still in the dark and need
the light to see.
"I AM"
"Gathering the fragments so that
none are lost"
His Shepherdess
http://missouri.thcministry.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
The GCW
Cannabis Sacrament Minister
Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 19 Nov 2003
Posts: 430

PostPosted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
US DC: PUB LTE: Representing Jonathan Magbie

Pubdate: Mon, 01 Nov 2004
Source: Washington Post (DC)

I was disappointed and profoundly saddened by Chief Judge Rufus G. King III's Oct. 22 letter about The Post's coverage of the death of my client, Jonathan Magbie. The judge's letter appeared calculated to tar my client with unproven allegations and to shift the blame for his death to others.

Judge King knows that jurors are instructed not to consider an indictment as evidence or inference of guilt beyond the fact that it is the procedure by which charges are brought against defendants. The able attorneys of the United States, after more than 15 months of investigation and deliberation, dismissed the gun and cocaine charges against Mr. Magbie in exchange for a plea to simple possession of marijuana.

The prosecutors also did not oppose Mr. Magbie's being sentenced under the provision of the law that allowed his arrest and conviction record to be wiped clean following completion of a probationary sentence.

It is the province of Judge Judith E. Retchin to sentence Mr. Magbie to a term of incarceration as she did; it is her judgment and the wisdom in doing so that are at issue.

Mr. Magbie's arrest and plea of guilty to the marijuana charge were his first and only ones; the pre-sentence report determined that he was not a danger to the community. Notably, that report reiterated that Mr. Magbie required around-the-clock nursing care. The probation officer assigned to prepare the report observed that Mr. Magbie experienced continual muscle spasms during his interview.

In sentencing Mr. Magbie, Judge Retchin said that she had checked with the chief judge's office the previous week and that the jail should have been able to accommodate Mr. Magbie's medical needs. If the doctor at the jail called to say that Mr. Magbie should be in the hospital, as the chief judge stated, the information would tend to dispute the initial assessment that the jail was able to take care of Mr. Magbie. Judge Retchin then was empowered to modify the sentence she had imposed the previous day. Judge King may not now rely on an exacting analysis of the information received from the doctor or the application for discretionary relief by counsel without the benefit of said information.

Judge Retchin is reported to have said that she was led to believe that Mr. Magbie's medical needs could have been met at the jail; the court spokeswoman, however, reportedly said that the full extent of Mr. Magbie's paralysis was inadvertently not relayed to the chief judge's office [Metro, Oct. 1]. The issue that Judge King must address is the due diligence -- or lack thereof -- of his office regarding the ability of the jail to accommodate Mr. Magbie's medical needs.

Judge King is a good and decent man, but it is time for leadership, not cheerleading or self-serving statements.

BONIFACE K. COBBINA

Washington

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1553/a09.html?397
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lilli
Cannabis Sacrament Minister
Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 4218

PostPosted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sniff
_________________

I pass to you the torch that Christ once passed to me.
Others are still in the dark and need
the light to see.
"I AM"
"Gathering the fragments so that
none are lost"
His Shepherdess
http://missouri.thcministry.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Fyrefly1
Cannabis Sacrament Minister
Cannabis Sacrament Minister


Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 2209

PostPosted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boy, no kidding Lilli!

The whole nation should weep for this travesty of justice......
_________________
Fyrefly1
"All truth passes through three stages: first it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer, 19th Century Philosopher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    THC - Cannabis - Ministry :: Community Forum Index -> Cannabis news All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Public forum Public Forum Members only Members only forum Members Group Members Group

THC-Light skin designed for Amsterdam Cannabis Ministry by JuggoPop
phpBB Group | THC Ministry Members | Cannabis Religion | Sacrament | Forum html archives | Site Map | RSS Feed |
ScriptWiz.com phpbb HTML Archiver - Created by ScriptWiz.com and released by Skinz.org