E-Mail Your Senator NOW!

[Stokes]

D o w n s i z e r - D i s p a t c h

Ever had a Hinchey in your Rohrbacher? Sounds painful. Medical marijuana could be the treatment you need.

Hinchey-Rohrbacher sounds like a terrible disease syndrome, but it's not. It's an amendment that could cure federal interference in the private medical decisions of doctors and patients in states that permit the medical use of marijuana.

Hinchey-Rohrbacher will be voted on tomorrow! For the only time in 2006! Now's your chance to help those who need the help medical marijuana can provide. Urge your Representative to pass Hinchey-Rohrbacher! You can do so here:

http://action.downsizedc.org/wyc.php?cid=47

Speaking of having a Hinchey in your Rohrbacher . . .

My father used to claim he had "a hitch in his get-along" whenever he was moving slow. It always made me laugh. And my Texas relatives were also fond of saying they were "fixing to start" something. Well, if you've had a hitch in your get-along that has kept you from using our electronic advocacy system, or if you've been fixing to start using it, now is the time to stop fixing and start starting. You never know when you'll contract something terrible that sounds like Hinchey-Rohrbacher, or perhaps get a painful Hinchey in your sensitive Rohrbacher, so don't let that hitch in your get-along leave you always fixing to start. Send your message to Congress now.

As a friend of mine is fond of saying, "I kid because I love." But medical marijuana is a deadly serious business for many. They need our help. And Representatives Hinchey and Rohrbacher deserve our thanks and praise for giving that help a glimmer of a chance.

Thank you for being a DC Downsizer.

Perry Willis
Communications Director
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.

TAKE ACTION NOW ... http://action.downsizedc.org/wyc.php?cid=47
_________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Where love is, there God is also.

-Mahatma Gandhi

[Torkel]

Done it yesterday.

Peace,
Torkel
_________________
Miller vs U.S. (230 F 2nd 486,489): "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime."

Miranda vs Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 125): "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them."

HAGANS vs LAVINE (415 US 533 N-3,note 5): "Once JURISDICTION is challenged it must be proven by the Plaintiff."

[Torkel]

Done it yesterday.

Peace,
Torkel
_________________
Miller vs U.S. (230 F 2nd 486,489): "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime."

Miranda vs Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 125): "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them."

HAGANS vs LAVINE (415 US 533 N-3,note 5): "Once JURISDICTION is challenged it must be proven by the Plaintiff."