| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Torkel
Cannabis Sacrament Minister
Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 1396
Location: West Virginia, USA
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 5:19 pm Post subject: Desertions blow hits Afghan army |
 |
|
| Quote: |
Desertions blow hits Afghan army
BY Roland Buerk
BBC News, Kabul
source:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4078118.stm
Hundreds of soldiers have deserted the Afghan National Army complaining of poor conditions and fierce resistance from the Taleban, US officials say.
It is a blow to the Afghan government which wants to increase the size of the force so the numbers of international troops in the country can be reduced.
The corps affected is the first to be deployed in the field.
Officials say another reason for men going absent is the difficulty they experience in dealing with their pay.
The 205th Corps of the Afghan National Army is based around the city of Kandahar.
The south of Afghanistan has seen some of the fiercest fighting against remnants of the Taleban and their al-Qaeda allies.
Members of the corps are in combat most days.
The US has about 18,000 troops in Afghanistan
A US military spokesman told the BBC that around 300 men have deserted.
That is one in 12 of the entire force.
Soldiers are paid around $75 a month - a good wage in Afghanistan - but the absence of a banking system prevents them from sending money to their families.
The news comes as American troops take more casualties.
On Wednesday two US soldiers were killed and eight others wounded in a rocket attack near the border with Pakistan.
The Afghan government's long term plan is for the numbers of international troops in the country to be reduced and for Afghanistan's own army to shoulder more of the burden of the fighting.
To do that numbers will need to be nearly tripled to around 70,000 by 2007. |
Peace,
Torkel
_________________
Miller vs U.S. (230 F 2nd 486,489): "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime."
Miranda vs Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 125): "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them."
HAGANS vs LAVINE (415 US 533 N-3,note 5): "Once JURISDICTION is challenged it must be proven by the Plaintiff." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Public Forum
Members only forum
Members Group
| 
