Bush is the real criminal, not Saddam. (?)

[Ferre]

You are sooo right brother, we have a serious global problem at our hands and the present U.S. administration is a symptom of it, not the cause. It's still the same old powermongers that were financing Hitler all those years ago.
I know this sounds crazy for most people but I have been studying history good enough to know this for fact.
_________________
█ Please read the Board Rules and Posting, and you
█ Radio Free Amsterdam
People who know truth, speak truth.
Those who don't, quote scriptures.

[Ferre]

You are sooo right brother, we have a serious global problem at our hands and the present U.S. administration is a symptom of it, not the cause. It's still the same old powermongers that were financing Hitler all those years ago.
I know this sounds crazy for most people but I have been studying history good enough to know this for fact.
_________________
█ Please read the Board Rules and Posting, and you
█ Radio Free Amsterdam
People who know truth, speak truth.
Those who don't, quote scriptures.

[natural_mom]

yes! the Rothchilds, who are supposed to be "jewish" funded Hitler! There is a huge global conspiracy going on. Did you know that in the 1930's, the united states went bankrupt and had to give themselves over to foriegn banks because these banks said they wouldn't lend them any money unless they did? And they are still bankrupt and owned by large illumnati run banks. The crown templar in britian is very much in control of things and it answers to the vatican so esencially, the vatican controls Britian, Canada and the USA.
_________________
peace. love. harmony.

[mr phew]

"Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean (D), appearing on "Face
the Nation" in September 2002, said, "There's no question that
Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States and to our allies."
In February 2003, during an address at Drake University, Dean
said, "I agree with President Bush -- he has said that Saddam
Hussein is evil. And he is. (Hussein) is a vicious dictator and a
documented deceiver. He has invaded his neighbors, used
chemical arms and failed to account for all the chemical and
biological weapons he had before the Gulf War. He has murdered
dissidents and refused to comply with his obligations under U.N.
Security Council Resolutions. And he has tried to build a nuclear
bomb. Anyone who believes in the importance of limiting the
spread of weapons of mass killing, the value of democracy, and
the centrality of human rights must agree that Saddam Hussein is
a menace. The world would be a better place if he were in a
different place other than the seat of power in Baghdad or any
other country. So I want to be clear. Saddam Hussein must disarm.
This is not a debate; it is a given.""

"Gen. Wesley Clark, before he became an anti-war Democratic
presidential candidate, testified on Sept. 26, 2002, before the
House Armed Services Committee: "There's no requirement to
have any doctrine here. I mean this is simply a longstanding right
of the United States and other nations to take the actions they
deem necessary in their self-defense. . . . Every president has
deployed forces as necessary to take action. He's done so without
multilateral support if necessary. He's done so in advance of
conflict if necessary. . . . When we took action in Kosovo, we did
not have United Nations approval. . . . There's no question that
Saddam Hussein is a threat. . . . Yes, he has chemical and
biological weapons. . . . He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing
nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear warheads
yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the
region would face greatly increased risks as would we."

"Former President Bill Clinton, more recently, visited Portuguese
Prime Minister Jose Manuel Durao Barroso in October 2003. The
prime minister said, "When Clinton was here recently he told me
he was absolutely convinced, given his years in the White House
and the access to privileged information which he had, that Iraq
possessed weapons of mass destruction until the end of the
Saddam regime.""

"John Rockefeller (D-W. Va.), ranking minority member of the
Intelligence Committee, said on Oct. 10, 2002, "There is
unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have
nuclear weapons within the next five years. . . . We also should
remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam
has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

Just listen to the Democrats' issue of the "unilateral" invasion of
Iraq, they make a pretty strong case.

Hmmmmmmm....